Well, it’s 3 months later and I’ve had a moment to pause and enjoy my successes, learn from my mistakes, and take the stress and strain in stride. One of the most interesting things about the experience was the WIDE range of attitudes toward the play. In the press, I had one very negative review, one very positive review, and one… uh… review? (Well, I’ll leave the editorializing to the critics.)
More interesting than the critical response was the response from the audience – equally torn. There were those who LOVED it, who really connected with the language or the universality of the characters. There were those that were offended by the theatrical conceits and highfalutin vocabulary. (And then there were my friends who politely ascribed to the “I had no idea what was going on but thought you did a wonderful job” philosophy.) Either way, I was proud of my cast for really embracing the language and quirks of the script and really, openly experimenting.
I did, however, want to recap the press from the show.
My interview with Nicholas Gilewicz from the Fringe Office
City Paper’s Best of the Fest Preview
Mark Cofta’s review of this “enthralling production”
Wendy Rosenfield was less than impressed
Jim Rutter is a man’s man… which is all I learned from this review

